palmspringsbum - Eviction Intended Decision CMB 11535

 
  
  
   1 |           IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
     | 
   2 |            COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, JOSHUA TREE DISTRICT
     | 
   3 | 
     | 
   4 | 
     | 
   5 | Bonita Millard,                   )  Case No.:  CMB 11535
     |                                   )
   6 |                                   )  STATEMENT OF INTENDED DECISION
     |                     Plaintiff,    )
   7 |                                   )
     |       vs.                         )
   8 |                                   )
     | Craig Canada,                     )
   9 |                                   )
     |                     Defendant.    )
  10 |                                   )
     | __________________________________)
  11 | 
     | 
  12 |      This matter came on regularly for trial before this Court on July 7,
     | 
  13 | 2004.  Plaintiff, Bonita Millard present, represented by attorney Lynne Romano.
     | 
  14 | Defendant, Craig Canada present, represented by Inland Counties Legal
     | 
  15 | Services by attorney Darrell Moore.
     | 
  16 |      The court makes the following findings and conclusion based upon the
     | 
  17 | evidence presented in trial, including but not limited to testimony,
     | 
  18 | documents, arguments and the courts impression of the credibility of the
     | 
  19 | witnesses who testified.
     | 
  20 | FINDINGS
     | 
  21 |      1.     Plaintiff has not retaliated against defendant;
     | 
  22 |      2.     Defendant himself stated that at the outset of the landlord
     | 
  23 |             tenant relationship that plaintiff was not concerned about his
     | 
  24 |             marijuana and cultivation.
     | 
  25 |      3.     Plaintiff became concerned when her water and electricity bill
     | 
     |             became elevated; she experienced confrontations with defendant,
     | 
     | 
     | 
     |                                            -1-
     |