image of spinning marijuana leaf
palmspringsbum
Morongo Valley
Felony Cultivation
Return of Property Reply to Opposition 4
Home
Timeline
Felony Cultivation
Eviction
HUD/DFEH Complaint
Last modified: July 11, 2012 10:56pm UTC
Return of Property Reply to Opposition
May 25, 2004 - page 4

1 To answer the first question, a court first must define the

2 activities at issue based on the particular facts of the case.

3 In Raich, the majority defined the class of activities at issue

4 as "intrastate noncommercial cultivation, possesion, and use

5 of marijuana for personal medicinal purposes on the advice of a

6 physician and in accordance with state law" and not "drug traf-

7 ficking." Raich, 352 F.3d at 1228-29. The class of activities

8 did "not involve sale, exchange, or distribution." Id. at 1229.

9 The court then considered whether this defined class of activi-

10 ties constituted commerce or any sort of economic enterprise.

11 It focused particularly on the fact that the purpose of the me-

12 dicinal marijuana was personal use and not economic or commer-

13 cial use: the user did "not seek to exchange it or to acquire

14 marijuana from others in a market." Id. at 1231. In contrast,

15 the court characterized the CSA as "part of a wider regulatory

16 scheme criminalizing interstate and intrastate commerce in

17 drugs." Id. at 1230. It thus concluded that the CSA, as applied

18 to the "cultivation, possesion, and use of marijuana for me-

19 dicinal purposes and not for exchange or distribution," did not

20 regulate commerce or any sort of economic enterprise. Id. at

21 1229.

22 The court also noted that "none of the cases in which the

23 Ninth Circuit has upheld the CSA on Commerce Clause grounds in-

24 volves the use, possesion, or cultivation of marijuana for

25 medical purposes." Raich, 352 F.3d at 1227.

26 Addressing the second Morrison factor, the court found that

27 there is no jurisdictional element limiting the CSA to a dis-

28 crete set of cases wherein interstate commerce is substantially

Page 4 of 7
Defendant's Reply to Oppoosition to Motion for Return of Property



copyright © 2003-2015 J. Craig Canada aka palmspringsbum.
Commercial use prohibited without consent. All rights reserved.