California

Marijuana and hemp politics.

Moderator: administration

California

Postby palmspringsbum » Sat May 27, 2006 10:22 am

Westly seemed to be caught off guard when Lanny Swerdlow, of the advocacy group Marijuana Anti-Prohibition Project, asked him about medical marijuana identification cards and Prop. 215.

"Well, I was hoping for some tougher questions," Westly said to laughter in the audience.

Westly said he supported medical marijuana in some cases but needed more information on the issue.



What a pitiful, half-baked answer. What a pitiful, half-baked governor he'd make.

The Press-Enterprise wrote:Steve Westly stumps in Inland towns

CAMPAIGN: The candidate is locked in a tight race with state Treasurer Phil Angelides for governor.



10:00 PM PDT on Friday, May 26, 2006
By WES WOODS II and MICHELLE DeARMOND
The Press-Enterprise



California Controller Steve Westly's eleventh-hour effort to drum up voter support hit the Inland area Friday, ending with an enthusiastic town hall meeting in a cramped desert library.

Westly told about 50 people in a Cathedral City library community room that he wants free community college for students who earn a two-year degree, transfer to a four-year school or commit to a vocational degree.

Westly seemed to be caught off guard when Lanny Swerdlow, of the advocacy group Marijuana Anti-Prohibition Project, asked him about medical marijuana identification cards and Prop. 215.

"Well, I was hoping for some tougher questions," Westly said to laughter in the audience.

Westly said he supported medical marijuana in some cases but needed more information on the issue.

Westly is locked in a tight race with state Treasurer Phil Angelides for governor.

His two-week bus tour of the state stopped Friday in Fontana and Cathedral City after appearances in Tulare and Bakersfield. The winner of the June 6 Democratic primary faces Republican Gov. Schwarzenegger in the November election.

Angelides spokesman Nick Papas said by phone that Westly has no plan for education and that if he wins, schools would see their funding slashed.

Before the town hall meeting, Cathedral City resident James Reynolds, 69, said he was undecided about the race.

"Frankly, both are excellent. I'm just unhappy with the attack ads" from each candidate, he said outside the community room.

After the meeting, he was still undecided, but said Westly "was certainly impressive."

Big Bear Lake residents and Democrats David and Carole Wiese brought their 9-year-old son Derek to the meeting.

Carole Wiese, a blogger for Bill Bradley' s New West Notes, said Westly's education stance is the right one for her young son. Westly, she said, is a better choice because he is a moderate Democrat unlike Angelides.

"With Westly, we can beat the governor," Wiese said. "With Angelides, we can't."

In the last gubernatorial poll by The Field Institute, Westly led Angelides 37 percent to 26 percent, but 34 percent of voters were undecided, making the race too close to call at the time of the April poll. Angelides previously led Westly, but the controller jumped to the lead following a springtime television ad blitz.

Both candidates were locked in dead heats with Schwarzenegger in hypothetical matchups in the nonpartisan Field Poll.

As an independently wealthy former eBay executive, Westly has had a financial advantage over his opponent and has poured $32.45 million of his own money into the campaign.

The latest campaign-finance reports filed Thursday show Westly had $3.6 million in the bank going into the final two weeks of the campaign.

Angelides, a former land developer, had nearly $3 million, according to the same reports, which reflect expenditures and contributions through May 20.

Angelides is scheduled to make his own stop in the Inland area this weekend, with appearances scheduled this afternoon in San Bernardino and Riverside. He plans to rally supporters gathered at a café and union workers at a labor hall to get out the vote for him.

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Postby palmspringsbum » Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:03 pm

opinioneditorials.com wrote:June 02, 2006


Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Immigration, and Medical Marijuana
Kenneth Michael White
opinioneditorials.com


At a 2 p.m. press conference on June 1, 2006, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger decided to end a 17-day standoff with the Bush Administration over immigration policy and the California National Guard.

Schwarzenegger agreed to send California’s troops to help participate in the Federal Government’s plan to secure the Mexican border with 6,000 National Guard personnel, even though the governor first appeared opposed to the idea.

Schwarzenegger has now indicated that he will send the troops to the border, but he also suggested that he could later change his mind on the matter. He was quoted as saying, “I'm the commander-in-chief…so I can take back the National Guard at any time that I want."

That is some bold talk from Schwarzenegger and it implies that if he does not like how the Bush Administration uses California’s troops, then the governor will call them back from the border.

The principle behind Schwarzenegger’s position is federalism. These are California’s troops; provided for with California’s resources and controlled by the State of California. Therefore, Schwarzenegger, as commander-in-chief of the California National Guard, can deploy the troops or not deploy them as he sees fit.

Of course, the governor must “see fit” to abide by the laws of the State of California, which begs the question: could Californians, through the ballot process, prevent their guard troops from enforcing Federal immigration law?

It is not a far-fetched question, to the extent that when it comes to medical marijuana that is basically what the voters of California have asked to be done.

In 1996, the voters of California passed the Compassionate Use Act, which decriminalized medical marijuana under State law (even though the Federal Government views all marijuana as illegal).

In 2002, a unanimous California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Compassionate Use Act and called it a “wholly” State law affair. Despite this ruling there are still some local officers in California who participate in Federal-led medical marijuana raids.

In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held that Federal officials may enforce medical marijuana prohibition against those people who distribute and manufacture medical marijuana to individual patients, but the issue here is not about the behavior of Federal officials, it is about the behavior of California officials. After all, these Federal-led raids use California’s resources to in effect criminalize conduct the State of California does not consider illegal.

Where is Schwarzenegger on this problem? Why hasn’t he prevented California’s resources from being used by the Federal Government to criminalize medical marijuana? Why hasn’t he asked the Bush Administration to recognize federalism when it comes to medical marijuana?

If Schwarzenegger is willing to let the Federal Government misuse California’s resources when it comes to medical marijuana, then he is probably willing to let the Federal Government misuse California’s National Guard when it comes to immigration policy.


Kenneth Michael White is an attorney and the author of “The Beginning of Today: The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937” and “Buck” (both by PublishAmerica 2004).

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Pushing pot: Fairfax medical marijuana activist campaigns fo

Postby palmspringsbum » Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:57 pm

The Marin Independent Journal wrote:Launched: 09/25/2006 05:14:00 AM PDT

Pushing pot: Fairfax medical marijuana activist campaigns for lieutenant governor

Tad Whitaker
The Marin Independent Journal



<table class=posttable align=right width=300><tr><td class=postcell><img src=bin/shaw-lynnette_front.jpg width=300></td></tr><tr><td class=postcap>Lynnette Shaw, founder of Marin's medical marijuana club, sits outside the club, Marin Alliance, in Fairfax. ( IJ photo/Alan Dep)</td></tr></table>When the Rev. Lynnette Shaw's Fairfax house turned into a moldy health hazard after the New Year's Eve flood, she didn't do what everyone else did.
Shaw, head of the Marin Alliance, which runs a medical marijuana dispensary in Fairfax, declared her candidacy for lieutenant governor, moved to Hollywood and started singing lead in a blues band on the Sunset Strip.

Shaw developed a marijuana-friendly platform, says she figured out a way to solve the immigration problem and, along the way, picked up an endorsement from Willie Nelson.

"It's an opportunity to throw away a vote and support medical marijuana," Shaw said.

Shaw still runs the alliance and the Fairfax pot clinic, and she plans to return to town after the campaign.

The Libertarian Party drafted Shaw to run after finding out she collected 15,000 votes in 2002 in a bid for the Marin General Hospital Board.

Party leaders gathered 1,000 signatures to qualify her for the Nov. 7 ballot.

Shaw moved to Hollywood for the dry, hot weather so her lungs could recuperate from health problems caused by her moldy Fairfax house. It's also where she came from 26 years ago before she moved to Marin County.

One of the first things Shaw did after heading south was find a Methodist church with an emphasis on music. Shaw said her old friend, John Belushi, planned to build a marijuana-themed singing act around her shortly before he died, and she said it finally seemed like a good time to give it a try.

"I'm not too old to rock 'n' roll," said Shaw, a 52-year-old graduate of Antioch High School. The blues act takes second billing to the campaign.

Shaw has addressed one group after another hoping to spread her message. The Retired American Alliance, Retired Police Officer's Association of Southern California and others like them have all heard her speak.

Her basic platform is outlined in a campaign statement:

"For years, the sick and terminally ill have been arrested, jailed and imprisoned for taking the medication of their choice. As lieutenant governor, I will stop this travesty. Medical cannabis was approved by the voters in 1996 and I promise to stop the federal government from overstepping their powers to interfere in medical choice. It has always been my opinion that government should be a referee and not a player in society. We need leadership that will foster the rights of citizens and their freedom to be left alone."

<table class=posttable align=left width=300><tr><td class=postcell><img src=bin/shaw-lynnette_side.jpg width=300></td></tr><tr><td class=postcap>Lynnette Shaw is founder of Marin's medical marijuana club, Marin Alliance, in Fairfax. Shaw is running for lieutenant governor. (IJ photo/Alan Dep )</td></tr></table>When talking to a bunch of retired cops about legalizing marijuana, Shaw said she sticks to the facts.

Prisons are full of nonviolent drug offenders, people can benefit from pot's medical qualities and taxes are going up in smoke to pay for marijuana law enforcement.

"I've shaken a lot of hands," she said. "I'm very well known around the state."

One person who has never heard of her is Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi, who is the front-runner in the lieutenant governor's race.

Garamendi stopped by the Independent Journal last week and shook his head when asked if he was familiar with Lynnette Shaw.

"I'm not," he said.

Shaw said her most ambitious plan would help illegal immigrants and native Californians alike.

She said she thinks California should invest money in Mexico to create an industrial-size hemp industry, organic farms and solar power fields.

Do that, she said, and Latinos will stay home with their families for the good jobs and Californians will reap the benefits of healthy food, a sustainable alternative to trees for paper, and clean energy.

"Willie Nelson thought it was a great idea," she said.

Shaw is on the road a lot these days, and she recently cruised through the Bay Area for a fundraiser thrown by a former member of Spinal Tap at an Oakland marijuana club.

Business at her Fairfax pot club is down 50 percent, she says, because many of her 3,000 clients have learned to grow their own marijuana - something of which she is extremely proud. She said that was the goal all along.

Shaw said the recent discoveries of marijuana valued by police nearly $80 million in West Marin shocked her group.

She said the pot farms were orchestrated by organized criminals who tore up the watershed and used pesticides on the crops, horrifying the organic marijuana community.

"They ruined the land in the name of greed," she said. "I'm furious."

Although she has little chance of winning, Shaw said getting the pro-pot message out helps the cause. She cited the time a few years back when she filed signatures to recall then-District Attorney Paula Kamena, who had gone after medical marijuana users - but turned down the heat after getting in the political fight with Shaw.

"Not one patient has been busted since we filed those signatures," she said.

<hr class=postrule><center><small>Read more Fairfax stories at the IJ's Fairfax page.
Contact Tad Whitaker via e-mail at twhitaker@marinij.com</small></center>

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Greens come out for Treatment, sell out to Prohibitionists

Postby palmspringsbum » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:49 pm

Screw the Greens I say!

Treatment is capitulation and surrender to DuPont and the Rehab Racket. Treatment means you're ALWAYS guilty and you ALWAYS have to pay. Treatment for marijuana is a lie in the first place - a legal fiction. Coming out for treatment support the lie that marijuana is addicitive.

Screw the Greens I say.

Treatment means no possibility of not guilty. Treatment means guilty, with no possibility of every being proven innocent.

Treatment is a sell-out. The Greens sold-out. Screw the Greens.

Green Party of the United States wrote:Press Release

Greens Call for Sane Drug Policy & End to the War on Drugs

Green Party of the United States
www.gp.org

Monday, September 25, 2006

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@greens.org

Greens call for an end to the War on Drugs and enactment of sane drug laws that treat addiction as a medical problem
<ul class=postlist><li>Greens cite disproportionate targeting of people of color: "The real crime is the War on Drugs" </li>

<li>Funding for the War on Drugs should be shifted to treatment </li></ul>WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Green candidates and leaders called for an end to the 'war on drugs,' calling national and state drug policy a 'war on American citizens' and a waste of national resources.

"Draconian drug laws, mandatory sentencing, zero tolerance, and 'three strikes' statutes have been used to lock away hundreds of thousands of young people, poor people, African Americans and other people of color in prisons and prevent them from living productive lives," said Clifford Thornton, Green candidate for Governor of Connecticut < http://www.votethornton.com >. "The Green Party recognizes drug addiction as a medical problem. Addicts should be treated as patients, not as criminals."

"If one does not understand racism, classism, white privilege, terrorism, and the war on drugs -- what these terms mean, how these concepts work -- then everything else you do understand will only confuse you," added Mr. Thornton, who is also co-founder of Efficacy, Inc. < http://www.efficacy-online.org >, which advocates major reforms in drug policy.

Greens especially called for immediate decriminalization of marijuana, citing an FBI annual Uniform Crime Report that police arrested an estimated 786,545 persons for marijuana violations in 2005, the highest number ever recorded, and that 88% of these were charged with mere possession.

"Marijuana prohibition needs to be repealed immediately -- death from marijuana use is nearly zero, while hundreds of thousands die every year from using alcohol and nicotine," said Matt Abel, Green candidate for Congress in Michigan's 9th District < http://www.voteabel.org >, member of NORML < http://www.norml.org >, and a criminal defense attorney and who has handled numerous marijuana cases. "Locking up Americans for such offenses is a waste of lives, and a waste of about $69 billion per year in taxpayer dollars. Furthermore, the prohibition against medical marijuana has denied relief for people who suffer various symptoms of AIDS and other serious diseases, just as prohibition in many states against needle exchange has allowed HIV to spread faster."

"Politicians who are afraid of being labeled 'soft on crime' have enacted laws that have only aggravated public health problems related to drug use," added Nelson Eisman, Green candidate for Governor of Wisconsin < http://www.voteEisman.org >.

"They drove addicts underground when they needed medical help. They increased the spread of drug-related violence, which is a result of drug prohibition, not a result of the drugs themselves. They turned young people into hardened criminals, and placed a third of young African American men behind bars at some point in their lives. The real crime is the war on drugs." [Source: Thomas P. Bonczar, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Prevalence of Imprisonment in the US Population, 1974-2001," NCJ197976, August 2003]

"The use of drugs by wealthy, powerful people like Bill Clinton or George W. Bush is considered a youthful indiscretion to be overlooked, while for middle class and especially poor Americans, it's something that deserves years of jail time," Mr. Eisman added.

Green Party leaders noted that the war on drugs, supported by both Democratic and Republican parties, has been used as an excuse for massive rights violations, especially denial of Fourth Amendment guarantees against warrantless search and seizure and Fifth Amendment guarantees of due process, and for military attacks against Colombia, Panama, and other Latin American countries.

"There is almost no difference between Democratic and Republican administrations or majorities in Congress when it comes to drug policy," said Kevin Zeese, Maryland Green candidate for the U.S. Senate < http://www.kevinzeese.com >, President of Common Sense for Drug Policy < http://www.csdp.org >, and co-founder of the Drug Policy Alliance (formerly Drug Policy Foundation) < http://www.drugpolicy.org >.

"The war on drugs has been an obvious model for President Bush's so-called war on terror. Both programs attempt to induce fear in the American public and target certain populations for vilification and incarceration. Both programs benefit corporate lobbies with enormous political influence -- the defense and security industries, and the growing private prison business that makes its profits by filling up cells."

MORE INFORMATION

Green Party of the United States
http://www.gp.org
1700 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 404
Washington, DC 20009.
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN
Fax 202-319-7193

Green campaign listings, news, photos, and web sites http://www.gp.org/2006elections
Database of 2006 Green candidates http://www.greens.org/elections
Video clips of Green candidates http://www.gp.org/2006elections/media.shtml
Green Party News Center http://www.gp.org/newscenter.shtml

Drug War Facts:
Drug Offenders In The Corrections System - Prisons, Jails and Probation http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm
Race, Prison and the Drug Laws (with information on the disproportionate incarceration of African Americans and other people of color) http://www.drugwarfacts.org/racepris.htm
Crime (with information on the correlation between drug prohibition and violence) http://www.drugwarfacts.org/crime.htm

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition: Criminal justice professionals speaking out against the "War on Drugs" http://www.leap.cc

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Campaign rivals clash in attorney general debate

Postby budman » Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:26 pm

The Argus wrote:Campaign rivals clash in attorney general debate
<blockquote>
<big><span class=postbold>Hopefuls accuse each other of extremism in battle for state's top crime-fighting position</span></big>
</blockquote>
The Argus
By Josh Richman, STAFF WRITER
Article Last Updated:10/06/2006 04:25:16 PM PDT

SAN FRANCISCO — Two candidates for attorney general met in a fiery but unsurprising debate Thursday, each accusing the other of extremism and distortion while vowing to battle crime and defend state laws.

Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, and state Sen. Chuck Poochigian, R-Fresno, met for a one-hour showdown at the studios of KCBS-TV/Channel 5, which webcast the event live. Moderated by the San Francisco Chronicle's editorial board, it was their first head-to-head debate, and the only one scheduled so far.

Poochigian, 57, said he offers a "fresh approach and aggressive action against the criminal element in society," and will work with police and new technologies to fight violent crime while continuing his crusades against identity theft and sexually violent predators.

He said he's a strong death-penalty supporter "in stark contrast to my opponent," who he said is a career politician, globetrotter and power-seeker long and ardently against capital punishment.

"Jerry Brown approaches this job out of a sense of entitlement," Poochigian said of the two-term mayor and former Secretary of State, two-term governor and three-time presidential candidate. "I approach it out of a sense of duty."

Brown, 68, said he offers "common sense and a practical approach" to running the state's legal affairs, with a record of integrity and innovation as well as a wealth of experience in state government's inner workings.

As mayor, he said, "I've helped put Oakland on the map" by attracting investment, expanding charter schools, ensuring green development and fighting crime.

Brown said he intentionally lives in a high-crime area so he can be closer to police and residents as they all grapple with crime, and he's endorsed by dozens of law enforcement groups including the California Police Chiefs Association.

"They're backing me, and I'm backing them," he said, also noting endorsements from Planned Parenthood and environmental groups such as the Sierra Club.

Brown vowed to uphold the death penalty despite his personal opposition, just as Poochigian vowed to uphold abortion rights despite his personal opposition. Each said the other can't be trusted.

Brown said he would change the state Justice Department's focus to "reorganize and beef up the Division of Law Enforcement" so more state agents can be mobilized to help overworked and outgunned local cops. He also said he stands ready to pour resources into defending the state's brand-new greenhouse-gas emission reduction law from inevitable attacks.

But Poochigian said Brown's crime-fighting history is "a deplorable record, it's an awful record" that has left Oaklanders in despair. "They don't feel safe there, they feel so much less safe than they did on the day Jerry Brown took office."

Brown later responded he's "throwing everything I can" at Oakland's crime problem, and Oakland has had fewer homicides during his two terms than during the eight previous years.

Meanwhile, he said, Poochigian is "way to the right of Arnold Schwarzenegger" in opposing gun-control measures.

Both candidates brought visual aids.

Brown displayed a .50-caliber round to illustrate Poochigian's 2004 vote against banning weapons that use this powerful ammunition.

Poochigian noted he voted this year to reaffirm that ban as well as the state's broader assault-weapons ban, though he earlier had opposed both. He also cited Brown's words spoke against gun control while in New Hampshire running for president. "He's all over the map... It's dripping with hypocrisy."

Poochigian produced photographs of the 21 victims of "Freeway Killer" William Bonin, whose 1996 execution by lethal injection was described by Brown as "Nazi-style." Brown noted he had used the term to describe the clinical, bloodless method of execution without moral culpability, even while acknowledging that Bonin was an awful murderer who had gotten off easily with so painless a death.

Brown said he would push the federal government to minimize conflict between California's permission of medical marijuana use and the drug's federal ban, but "we are in a bind... Ultimately the federal law is supreme."

Poochigian said he too "would very aggressively... try to negotiate in whatever way we could" while halting widespread abuse of the state law, which he opposed in 1996. "It's not working as it was advertised."

Poochigian said his Senate voting record belies Brown's effort to paint him as an anti-environmental extremist: "My philosophy is one of balance" between environmental protection and economic growth."

But Brown noted his own endorsements by environmental groups and said Poochigian — who opposed the new global-warming law — is "a constant ally of those businesses who don't want to do their duty" in maintaining public health and a clean state.

The Field Poll this week showed Brown has a 15 percentage point lead, down from 21 points in July. He has about $5 million in his campaign war chest while Poochigian has about $1.7 million, according to reports just filed with the Secretary of State's office.

Green Michael Wyman of San Rafael, Libertarian Kenneth Weissman of Beverly Hills and Peace & Freedom Jack Harrison of Berkeley also are running for Attorney General but weren't included in Thursday's debate.


See the entire debate at http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_278135154.html.



Contact Josh Richman at jrichman@angnewspapers.com.

User avatar
budman
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm

Albany: Measure D

Postby budman » Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:33 am

<span class=postbold>See:</span> Albany: Measure D - Should Albany permit a single dispensary?
User avatar
budman
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm

Arcata candidate Bobby Harris talks housing, economic issues

Postby palmspringsbum » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:33 am

The Eureka Reporter wrote:
Arcata candidate Bobby Harris talks housing, economic issues

by Rebecca S. Bender, 10/9/2006
The Eureka Reporter

<table class=posttable align=right width=260><tr><td class=postcell><img src=bin/harris_bobby.png width=260></td></tr></table>For Arcata City Council candidate Bobby Harris, the interrelated issues of housing, economic development and transportation are the “three primary features of address for our community.”

“Housing is the most fundamental feature of the community, and the housing situation in Arcata has been in escalating crisis,” he said.

One of the best answers, he believes, is the introduction of rent control in the city. Such a program would provide an opportunity for what he called the “permanent working class” to become a part of the community, rather than marginalized and temporary.

“Arcata is very environmental, but we really haven’t reached the planning consciousness necessary yet,” he said. While the city has a number of environmental committees, he said, it lacks a housing committee — a glaring oversight, in his estimation.

“I’d like to offer options to traditional development, change the paradigm,” he suggested, possibly exploring housing as an industry, expanding on the modular program being developed in Hoopa, for example.

“A different kind of modular housing,” he added, a style that builds “small but tall,” could provide more housing options for residents as well as introducing a new business to the area.

With tourism also playing such a large role in Arcata’s economy, he said, the city should encourage the development of attractions and resources such as the proposed trail along the railroad tracks. In addition to tourism, light manufacturing could also be improved through coordinated efforts with local agencies, he said. Developing a pilot project with Humboldt State University related to alternative transportation, for example, would address both economic and environmental issues. The city should be using the applied engineering and business skills HSU students have to offer, Harris observed, as well as supporting incubation programs and promoting targeted marketing.

“How better to represent Arcata and its environmental commitment than providing a useful venue for public participation?” he asked. “Preserving the environment here in every way, shape and form we can is imperative. We’re lucky enough to live in a paradise, and we need to preserve it.”

Creative and integrated solutions are Harris’ answer to most problems: “I like practical results instead of just hot air,” he explained. He also said he likes to tie together seemingly disparate threads into a single plan.

In addressing concerns related to the Plaza, for example, he started by explaining, “I think the statue of McKinley ought to be fondly ensconced in deep right field of the ball park.”

In McKinley’s place, he continued, a pavilion should be built, providing a community gathering place.

“You have to foster more community participation in the area and create better energy on the Plaza,” he said. And by creating a space for public interaction, he said, less space is available for those who have little stake in the community.

Implementing an ordinance to penalize establishments known to be responsible for disturbances could also address some of downtown’s problems, he said, and if a heavy enough penalty is enforced, the ordinance could provide both an effective deterrent and a financial pool to help support needed police resources. He disagrees with the idea of targeting the downtown taverns with a tax, however, supporting instead better coordination and cooperation between businesses, law enforcement and other agencies as well as with the community at large.

Looking outside Arcata’s immediate boundaries, Harris said, “I’m strongly in support of the council taking stands on various state and national issues from time to time with good reasons. It’s important to raise the city’s voice on issues, to connect with other communities.”

From a political standpoint, he admitted, resolutions such as those calling for the impeachment of President George W. Bush can be “complex” and cause fractures within the community. He suggested forming a city committee that could review all such resolutions and proclamations, holding publicly accessible hearings and providing opportunities for extensive public debate before any items go to the City Council for consideration.

“It would create a better atmosphere and better community dialogue,” he said.

However, he also recognized the limitations of mere pieces of paper, and emphasized the need for practical solutions and multifaceted approaches.

“Our participation in political parties is at least as important,” he said.

Harris is a registered Democrat and a 10-year resident of Arcata. A well-known medical marijuana activist, he describes himself as having a lifelong interest in politics.

“I’m a student of it, and I have been for a long time,” he said. He ran three times for a City Council seat in Woodland, he said, but has not yet run for any office locally.

“Arcata is a very special place, and it’s become my home,” he said. “I want to do what I can to preserve and enhance the community here.”

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Candidates vie to be 'warm bucket of spit'

Postby palmspringsbum » Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:37 pm

The San Mateo County Times wrote:Candidates vie to be 'warm bucket of spit'

<big><span class=postbold>Lieutenant governor race heating up</span></big>

By Josh Richman, STAFF WRITER
Article Last Updated:10/09/2006 06:19:17 AM PDT
The San Mateo County Times

<table class=postbold align=right width=300><tr><td class=postcell><img src=bin/garamendi-mcclintock.jpg width=300></td></tr></table>Garamendi, McClintock lock horns in battle to be lieutenant governor Both major-party candidates vying to be California's next lieutenant governor are longtime officeholders who aspire to be governor, but that's about all the common ground they share.

State Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi is a liberal, Democratic, former Clinton administration official and state senate majority leader from Walnut Grove who unsuccessfully ran for governor in 1982 and 1994 and briefly entered 2003's gubernatorial recall election race.

He says his top priorities are improving the state's education system to produce a more skilled work force; protecting the environment and ensuring every Californian has access to affordable health care.

State Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, is a conservative who was the GOP nominee for state controller in 1994 and 2002, losing the latter race by a hair; he also finished third in 2003's recall vote, behind Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger and Democrat Cruz Bustamante.

He says his top priorities are protecting private property rights from eminent domain seizures and other threats, and battling government waste and fraud in order to rein in state spending.

Garamendi supported the state minimum wage increase to $8 per hour but would have preferred to index future increases to inflation; McClintock opposed the recent increase, saying it will eliminate entry-level jobs.

On immigration, Garamendi supports driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, whom he said should be penalized but also given an opportunity to attain legal status. McClintock opposes driver's licenses and in-state college tuition subsidies for illegal immigrants, and believes state agencies should report illegal immigrants to federal authorities. Both call for better border security.

Garamendi endorsed Proposition 71 of 2004, which authorized a $3 billion bond issue to fund a state institute to coordinate and fund stem-cell research, saying it ensured California would be at the forefront of critical medical advancements. McClintock co-authored a ballot argument against Proposition 71, expressing support for stem-cell research but decrying this measure as corporate welfare through a costly, unaccountable new state bureaucracy.

And Garamendi supports the infrastructure bond package on November's ballot, saying roads and mass transit, schools, housing and levees are critical to the state's economic future. McClintock opposes all of November's bond measures except the levee bond, saying it's unfair to burden the next generation with spending that will be obsolete by then anyway.

The state GOP has aired ads blasting Garamendi, in his first insurance commissioner's term, for his seizure and sale of junk-bond-riddled Executive Life; some policyholders later said he got them a raw deal.

Garamendi paints McClintock as an arch-conservative out of step not only with most Californians' stances on social issues such as abortion, but also with Schwarzenegger's more moderate policy agenda.

The lieutenant governor takes over when the governor is out of the state or unable to govern. He or she also is the state Senate's president and tie-breaking vote; a University of California regent; a California State University trustee; the Commission for Economic Development's chair; and a member of other state bodies.

Some see the job much as the vice presidency, which Vice President John Nance Garner so famously likened to "a warm bucket of spit" — mostly useless unless the chief executive is sidelined.

For some it's a stepping-stone to the top job; Bustamante tried it in 2003, and Gray Davis succeeded in 1998. McClintock says he'll run for governor in 2010; Garamendi is more likely to do so if Schwarzenegger wins this year and leaves the seat open in 2010 rather than if Democrat Phil Angelides wins and then seeks re-election.

Also running are American Independent Jim King, a Riverside real estate broker favoring government efficiency and the state income tax's abolition; Green Donna Warren, a Los Angeles financial planner and activist calling for prison reform and living wages; Libertarian Lynnette Shaw, a Fairfax medical-marijuana club operator seeking to protect such clubs while pursuing hemp-based energy and economic solutions; and Peace & Freedom candidate Stewart Alexander, a Murrieta car salesman calling for affordable health care and housing and free college education.

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Postby palmspringsbum » Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:23 pm

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California

Forum brings humility, testiness to campaign

Postby Midnight toker » Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:33 pm

The Tahoe Daily Tribune wrote:<img src=/bin/spacer.gif width=520 height=0>
Forum brings humility, testiness to campaign

<table class=posttable align=right width=420><td><tr class=postcell><img class=postimg src=bin/tahoe_council-candidates.jpg></td></tr><tr><td class=postcap>Jim Grant / Tahoe Daily Tribune / City Council candidates, from left, Tom Wendell, Bill Crawford, Kathay Lovell, Jerry Birdwell, Tom Davis and Mike Phillips express their views on numerous issues at a forum on Wednesday night.</td></tr></table>The Tahoe Daily Tribune
Susan Wood, swood@tahoedailytribune.com
October 12, 2006

With slices of emotion, entertainment and enterprise, six candidates running for three seats on the South Lake Tahoe City Council took up a variety of subjects that ranged from the professional to personal.

Featured were the roles of the Lake Tahoe Airport, support for medicinal marijuana and who the candidates most admire in life as 30 people at the Timber Cove Lodge Wednesday listened in to the first of two Tahoe Daily Tribune-sponsored debates. Action Editor Tim Parsons moderated.

Businessman Tom Davis chose Mother Teresa, Donald Trump and John F. Kennedy - "even though I'm not a Democrat," he quipped.

Century 21 real estate agent Michael Phillips couldn't select any one person but said he surrounds himself with many who make a difference in his life.

Recreation enthusiast Tom Wendell selected his mother because of "her ability to sacrifice" and people like Julia Butterfly Hill, who staged a nationally known tree sit to protect the redwoods in Humboldt County.

Lovell and Birdwell thought of their fathers. Lovell's had polio, and despite the illness - "not one single day did he ever complain." She recited his three-way mantra from memory: "Do the right thing. Do the best you can. And treat others the way you'd like to be treated." She threw talk-show host Oprah Winfrey in for good measure.

Birdwell admired his father for his success, honesty and fairness that "he instilled in all his kids."

Retired teacher Bill Crawford pointed to his wife, Jonnie - who was in the audience, because of her counseling ability and knitting skill.

"You know, I'm not always a nice man. I don't look globally at things. I look at what's in front of me," he said. The audience laughed with him.

That may have been where the warm and fuzzy mood ended. A few rebuttals and questions later, the inquiry into how the mayor is selected got testy and led to a few verbal swipes.

Phillips asked the audience to look at the votes on the council of Lovell and Davis, with the latter wrapping up three terms two years ago. He also took aim at Birdwell's support of the now-defunct, city-spawned Tourism Promotion Business Improvement District, calling it an appalling ordinance that "should not be forgotten."

All the candidates agreed the city attorney should not be elected except Crawford, who called her job "a pressure cooker" in terms of having to follow the law and be under the domain of an ambitious council.

Birdwell, Davis, Crawford and Phillips thought raises of up to 30 percent for city department heads and employees were either excessive or unjustified to different degrees - since so many fees went up for citizens. Lovell explained how the city "made a lot of sacrifices" in the last three years to get the city to a more stable fiscal position.

Their stances on whether they'd support a city sanctioning medicinal marijuana provided another mixed reaction. Phillips, Lovell and Davis - who provided an emphatic no - chose not to. As one who has undergone the pain of 21 surgeries, Wendell explained nature has a better way than the medical industry's lengthy list of pharmaceuticals. Crawford agreed, but followed up with how he would not support illegal activity.

The solution of reducing pollutants into Lake Tahoe off the road through use of the airport came up with Wendell pointing to cleaner jets, Crawford wanting the aviation facility to pay for itself, Lovell looking at Monterey as a case example, Birdwell believing the convention center project is tied to the airport's success and Davis blaming its commercial service downfall on "mitigation hell."

One could argue the candidates are in their own state of forum madness. Another one is scheduled by Soroptimist International next Wednesday. The Tribune follows up a week later at 5:30 p.m. with its second forum.

User avatar
Midnight toker
Member
Member
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:18 pm
Location: around the bend

Thompson upbeat; foes face uphill climb

Postby palmspringsbum » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:19 pm

The Davis Enterprise wrote:Monday October 23, 2006

Thompson upbeat; foes face uphill climb


By Cory Golden/Enterprise staff writer
The Davis Enterprise
Published Oct 22, 2006 - 20:02:21 CDT.


Ousting four-term incumbent Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Napa, amounts to no small task.

He won 67 percent if the vote in 2004. This time out, he’s raised $1.5 million.

Two of his District 1 opponents — Republican John W. Jones, a retired police officer living in Davis, and Peace and Freedom candidate Timothy J. Stock, a West Sacramento attorney — are running for office for the first time.

Green Party candidate Pamela Elizondo of Laytonville received 4.8 percent of the vote in 2004.

Jones has tallied the most money among the challengers: $61,000, according to the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics.

District 1 includes Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino and Napa counties, part of Sonoma County and southern Yolo County.

Its voter registration breaks down like this: 45 percent Democrat and 28.9 percent Republican, with 19.1 declining to state a party preference. Green Party faithful are the next largest group, at 2.88 percent.

<span class=postbold>Thompson</span>

Without a big-name challenger, the 55-year-old Thompson has put ample energy and some of his money into the Democratic effort to retake the House. He has led an effort to defend 12 seats that in 2004 either went to President Bush or where Democrats won by slim margins.

Thompson said last week he had grown “cautiously optimistic” his party will regain the majority.

If that happens the California delegation — behind Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who is in line to be speaker — will hold considerable sway.

Thompson said it would push for: increasing the minimum wage; repealing a rule stopping the Secretary of Health for negotiating for lower prescription drug prices; repealing Bush’s veto of a bill loosening restrictions on stem cell research; and bolstering the student loan program.

A member of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, Thompson’s own priorities would include: standing against efforts to privatize Social Security; addressing climate change, including providing incentives for the development of alternative energy and carbon sequestration; and again calling for “pay-as-you-go” rules requiring that Congress pay for any bill it passes.

Thompson has called for a better accounting of the estimated $11 million an hour being spent in Iraq. The Vietnam veteran, who voted against the war, said that U.S. troops should pull out of Iraq “as soon as practicable.”

“This stay-the-course strategy is no strategy at all — it’s a political slogan,” he said. “It’s an embarrassment.”

From his current term, Thompson spotlighted the passage of his bill protecting 273,000 acres of Northern California as wilderness; a bill creating a commission to investigate chemical and biological weapons testing on servicemen and women between 1962 and 1974; and a bill increasing the tax deductions available for landowners who sign conservation easements, protecting their land from development.

Thompson is a former state senator. He and his wife own a small vineyard and have two grown sons.

Online: mikethompson.house.gov.

<span class=postbold>Jones</span>

Jones says he is campaigning to bring integrity and “conservative, tradition, family-type values” to Congress.

He draws a sharp line between himself and Thompson on Iraq and combating terrorism.

“I am very much of the position that we should stay the course...,” he said. “We’re defending ourselves.”

Jones said Congress should vigorously debate such issues, but present a “unified voice” after votes are taken. Dissension among the country’s leaders means “a show of weakness” that emboldens terrorists, he said.

“The incumbent is a classic example of ‘I didn’t get my way, so now I’m going to raise hell about it,” Jones said. “You can’t do that.”

Jones would target taxes and government bureaucracy, privatizing at least a portion of Social Security and limiting Medicare eligibility.

Congress has shown little will to reform immigration, he said. Borders should be secured with physical or virtual fences and increased law enforcement, services for non-citizens except for emergency care should be eliminated, and the government should crack down on businesses knowingly hiring illegal workers.

Companies should hire workers through the existing worker visa program, he said, a process that should both be streamlined and include background and medical checks.

Thompson has not done enough to improve infrastructure in his district, the challenger said, and the wilderness bill the congressman touts flies in the face of “smart harvesting” of trees that would lessen fire risks while creating jobs.

Fifty-eight and single, Jones retired from the UC Davis Police Department after 31 years on the job here and in Santa Barbara. He holds an MBA from UCD and a bachelor’s degree in political science from UC Santa Barbara. He has served as a Scoutmaster and as an adviser to service fraternity Alpha Phi Omega.

Online: johnwjonesforcongress.com.

<span class=postbold>Stock</span>

Stock, 61, said he agrees with Thompson on local issues, but has a beef with Congress in general.

“Those people haven’t stood up for anything, and they’re not doing what’s in the national interest,” Stock said.

He calls for a withdrawal from Iraq in the next year.

Stock supports a “benevolent approach” to immigration, registering workers.

His other focus would be increasing the minimum wage and providing basic health care worth $12 per hour. He would propose eliminating taxes on the first $25,000 of earnings, with the income tax increased incremental steps up to “40 or 50 percent” for those making over $250,000 a year.

Stock also believes there is too much intrusion into personal privacy in the name of national security and worries about the suspension of habeas corpus.

Stock said he is “a little more capitalistic” than the Peace and Freedom Party. He said he supports its call for impeaching Bush, “but I don’t think it’s realistic.”

A graduate of the University of Illinois law school, Stock holds an MBA from the University of Pittsburgh. A California resident since 1987, he is divorced with two grown daughters.

Those interested in his campaign may e-mail vote2006@cow.com. For more on his party, see peaceandfreedom2006.org.

<span class=postbold>Elizondo</span>

Elizondo, 63 and a member of the Green Party since 2000, has been promoting a message of “Five Simple Rules to Save the Earth and Its Inhabitants.”

Taxes should be collected by a three-cent tax (one cent each for county, state and federal government) on every dollar transaction, she said. Governments should then buy what they want through private businesses.

The money the government now spends on defense, space research, sports arenas and charity to other counties should be used instead to pay citizens $15 an hour for a 30-hour work week, plus a $300 housing stipend, and efforts to save the environment.

Businesses should be given tax exemptions for money spent on research to better the environment, and marijuana and hemp should be legalized for all uses.

Elizondo said she believed law enforcement, judges and elected officials often violate citizens’ constitutional rights.

“They throw people in jail for nothing,” she said.

Elizondo is the divorced mother of three grown sons. She has worked as a psychiatric technician at a state hospital, co-owner of a candle-making business and bartender, and has taken classes at two junior colleges and Sonoma State University.

Online: sonomagreenparty.org/pamelizondo.html.

— Reach Cory Golden at cgolden@davisenterprise.net or 747-8046.

Sunday, October 22, 2006

User avatar
palmspringsbum
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California


Return to politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron